skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Non speak week: silencing scientists
A must read: Non speak week: silencing scientists by Stephen Strauss: http://pencanada.ca/blog/how-science-can-help-the-feds-save-face/
"Whenever I try to explain to ordinary people why the present
Conservative government’s muzzling of its scientists is a wrongheaded
and self-destructive act, I begin by stating the obvious. Not letting
scientists readily talk to journalists expresses a fundamentally
un-scientific mentality.
Then I quote what French historian Arthur
Mangin wrote nearly 150 years ago. “Connaître, découvrir, communiquer —
telle est la destinée d’un savant” or as that reads in English “to get
to know, to discover, to communicate – this is the destiny of a
scientist.” The sentence announces what anyone who knows anything about
science already understands. Science is not about uncovering something
that you aren’t going to tell anyone else about because you are afraid
of what they are going to make of your discovery. Science is
intrinsically a hive activity in which communication and explication of a
discovery isn’t just a good thing, it is an intrinsic thing. Maybe
almost the intrinsic thing.
Science is intrinsically a hive activity
in which communication and explication of a discovery isn’t just a good
thing, it is an intrinsic thing. Maybe almost the intrinsic thing.
Scientists measure the impact of what they have found by the numbers of
times others cite their work. They love it when others try to reproduce
their findings. They speak about what they have done at any institution,
conference or webinar which will have them. And they are increasingly
blogging like mad about what is going on in their fields – a
communicating mania that can viewed at sites such as scienceblogs and
technorati. I personally have never seen as gossipy a collective as the
hallways and meeting rooms and even lavatories of a scientific
get-together.
So when the government muzzles its scientists and
forbids them from talking journalists it has resulted in behavior that
seems almost pathologically non-scientific.
Think of when Ottawa
Citizen reporter Tom Spears asked the National Research Council what its
joint falling snow study with NASA was about. After 11 staffers and
dozens of emails went back and forth considering the request, the NRC
really didn’t respond. While this was occurring, a request to a NASA
scientist for information got all Spears’ questions answered in 15
minutes."
No comments:
Post a Comment