skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Is Canadian government 'muzzling its scientists'?
Is Canadian government 'muzzling its scientists'? read and decide for yourself: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16861468
... "Prof Thomas Pedersen, a senior scientist at the University of
Victoria, said he believed there was a political motive in some cases.
"The Prime Minister (Stephen Harper) is keen to keep control of the
message, I think to ensure that the government won't be embarrassed by
scientific findings of its scientists that run counter to sound
environmental stewardship," he said.
"I suspect the federal
government would prefer that its scientists don't discuss research that
points out just how serious the climate change challenge is."
The Canadian government recently withdrew from the Kyoto protocol to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
The allegation of "muzzling" came up at a session of the AAAS meeting
to discuss the impact of a media protocol introduced by the Conservative
government shortly after it was elected in 2008.
The protocol
requires that all interview requests for scientists employed by the
government must first be cleared by officials. A decision as to whether
to allow the interview can take several days, which can prevent
government scientists commenting on breaking news stories.
Sources
say that requests are often refused and when interviews are granted,
government media relations officials can and do ask for written
questions to be submitted in advance and elect to sit in on the
interview."
And this is the story on CTV: http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20120217/feds-muzzle-scientists-120217/
"For almost three weeks after David Tarasick published findings about
one of the largest ozone holes ever discovered above the Arctic, the
federal scientist was barred from breathing a word about it to the
media.
Kristi Miller was similarly gagged from granting interviews
about her own research into a virus that might be killing British
Columbia's wild sockeye salmon, despite going to print in the
prestigious journal Science.
Such incidents aren't one-off
occurrences, but instead represent a trend of "muzzling" policies being
imposed on Canadian scientists by federal agencies under the
Conservative government, a panel told their international peers Friday
at a global science conference in Vancouver.
"It's pretty clear that
for federal scientists, Ottawa decides now if the researchers can talk,
what they can talk about and when they can say it," senior science
journalist Margaret Munro, with Postmedia News, told a group gathered at
the American Association for the Advancement of Science annual meeting.
"We're not talking about state secrets here."
The views were aired in tandem with the release of an open letter by a
coalition of six science and communications organizations, who jointly
called on Prime Minister Stephen Harper to "tear down the wall" that's
been raised over the past four years separating scientists, journalists
and the public.
"Despite promises that your majority government
would follow principles of accountability and transparency, federal
scientists in Canada are still not allowed to speak to reporters without
the 'consent' of media relations officers," the letter says."
And this one on CBC: http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2012/02/17/science-federal-muzzling-scientists.html
"Canadian government scientists are still being hampered from talking
to the media about their taxpayer-funded research and that's bad news
for the public, say groups representing both journalists and federal
scientists.
The groups appealed to delegates at an international
meeting of scientists in Vancouver on Friday, arguing that democracy
depends on citizens having access to research so they can make informed
decisions about government policy.
"If we're talking about policy
that's informed by fact, if we're asking people to be critical thinkers,
if we're asking people to engage in democratic process and to engage in
democracy, it's incumbent of all of us that we make sure the process is
transparent," said Kathryn O'Hara, a Carleton University journalism
professor."
No comments:
Post a Comment